Cures, '©ure$,' and the FDA

[UPDATE] The court case being advanced by the Dept of Justice and FDA against Daniel Smith for distributing (trafficking) MMS has been changed. Daniel’s wife Karis DeLong and Tammy Olson, who worked at Project Green Life, will be tried on December 1, 2014, at the U.S. Courthouse in Spokane, Washington, as originally scheduled. Daniel’s trial has been rescheduled to March 3, 2015, at the same location. 

[UPDATE UPDATE] The December 1, 2014 trial is canceled. See “Fraud, Justice, and the MMS Story” for more details.

I intend to be at both, but it will have to be with assistance. I am not on anyone’s payroll. No one pays me to think what I think, write what I write, or to publish what I publish. Nor do I charge anyone to read it. I do not have an employer, nor am I seeking one. I have not made it easy for the public to buy my books or videos. I don’t require paid subscriptions to access the information that I produce. I have not turned on the option to allow ads to appear on this blog, yet the bills keep coming, which in spite of the proclivities listed above, I do my best to pay.

So if you come across something I’ve done that strikes a chord with you, a purchase would be most appreciated. If you’re moved to send a donation, that would be appreciated too.

Water Research and Enhancement Has Become My Work

My proclivity to set my needs aside and help others has done just that, helped others while I often floundered taking care of my needs. This has certainly applied to water enhancement technologies, but it didn’t begin there. On the plus side, I’ve also learned quite a bit, enough to want to keep at it, this time to build a business around a product that I have a more direct connection to, and can profit with.

This week the first new Rainmaker H2O in-line optimal water unit, the R-100 for 1″ or 3/4″ lines [typically for homes, greenhouses, office locations, factories, etc.), will roll out after a two-month hiatus while we are refining, re-sourcing, re-testing, and re-introducing the entire product line. The R-100 will be the first model available. We will verify the new design and operational parameters of the other variants for smaller and larger line sizes. I will also post better product photos than the one below.

These devices raise water’s energetic state as it passes through. (Available at www.photonicwater.com)

While the statement may sound nebulous, there are tangible, measurable differences in water’s behavior and you could say, its “potency,” when it is put in a high-spin, high-energy state, versus the condition that it is normally in when it comes out of the tap… which is to say, “sorry”.

Water treatment methods and delivery are only partially responsible. Water’s nature as an information, energy, and life transporter, along with its supreme ability to faithfully record the most subtle of impressions, also referred to as vibrations and frequencies, round out the picture.

This it not something that either the proponents of MMS or the FDA factor into their various arguments or assertions about the compound’s behavior. The threshold of harm and benefit is not nearly as clearly defined, or engraved in stone, as both would officially have you to believe. I am not speaking of Daniel Smith in this instance. I am speaking of the true “enemy combatants” in this drama; the FDA vs your perception of MMS and Jim Humble. Water and its nature is an unfactored factor that affects both “truths”.

A New Respect For H₂O

Water is considered to be just another neutral chemical compound, when nothing could be further from the truth. There is something special about water that medical and general science is loath to acknowledge; it demonstrates the qualities of sentience, or consciousness. It enables Life as we know it, and Life that we do not yet comprehend.

The ethos of Medical Science is built around the idea that the human body is also a neutral and unchanging landscape that has been “attacked” by a “disease,” generally in the form of viruses, bacteria, rashes, cysts, lesions, fungi, or tumors. Yet, all of the things I just described are either living, or products of the body itself. In other words, they are part of Life.

Life expressions all have something in common; their ability to form is triggered and supported, in part, by the state of the water medium, both inside and outside its point of manifestation. So far, few people consider just how critical this state is, even though every human body, as well as all life, forms in a water medium that is in a particular energetic and informational state. The health (or lack thereof), of the being, is profoundly impacted by the health of the water that courses through the human body.

Yet the FDA, EPA, and other agencies, permit and allow chlorine bleach and sodium fluoride to be insinuated into the biochemical matrix inside hundreds of millions of Americans each day without their consent.

If you take a shower or bath, or brush your teeth with a commercial product, then your body is taking in the information and vibration that these chemicals represent. When disease eventually happens, which occurs much sooner than it used to, the baton is handed over to medicine, which steps up the chemical cascade. Yet, this can be mitigated by clearing water of its informational imprints before using.

The Medical Industrial Complex goes on the theory that off-the-shelf products, “stabilized” in some way, often with biological material synthesized from animals that resist metabolic breakdown, can be administered generically, as a mechanic would use off-the-shelf “OEM” replacement parts when repairing an automobile. This practice ignores the body’s inherent nature.

Properly nourished, the human body is naturally self-regulating, biochemically self-sufficient, and self-correcting. We have gone off track as a species by adopting and inundating ourselves and environment with unnatural compounds, and then using variants of the same compounds in a feeble and expensive attempt to remedy the eventual metabolic dysfunctions that they cause.

Instead of removing said compounds from the body’s environment when disease sets in (to help health return), we slather on more (which furthers a disease cascade). Our entire medical education system is profoundly biased toward pharmacological rather than a naturopathic and nutrition-based methods of remediation. Yet, the implicit dissimilarities between patented, laboratory compounds and natural counterparts, render the former ineffective when put to the test. That is, if you’re intent on affecting real cures and true healing.

If you’re simply trying to affect what looks like a “©ure,” then that’s another thing altogether.

Let’s be honest about ‘©ure$’

Okay, I’ll admit it, I’ve gotten cute with the word “cure.” However, this representation of the FDA’s dictum that anything that is curative, is a drug, is closer to the truth. In fact, this is the only way that their statement could possibly be true.

According to Section 201(g) of the FD&C Act (21 USC 321(g)), the term “drug” includes:

• (B) articles intended for use in the diagnosis, cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease in man or other animals;

Let’s look at these words. articles that are intended for use. Under this definition, a blanket given to a person who has a chill would fill the FDA’s definition of a drug.

On the other hand, whether it actually fulfills the intent, is meaningless. In other words, a drug doesn’t have to “cure,” in order to merit FDA approval, nor does it have to aid in the individual’s healing. It need only be construed to be intended to cure, mitigate, or be appropriate for the treatment or prevention of diseases in man or other animals.

Don’t you like the inference of oneness between man and other animals?

There is no burden of proof of effectiveness in curing either stated, or implied in the FDA’s definition. It is vague enough to allow them to decide to prosecute or persecute anyone that they want, for virtually any reason, as long as you and I don’t take exception to their actions by speaking up or holding congressional policymakers accountable to us rather than to lobbyists.

Here’s the greater truth. The one that actually cures, is the body itself. Its healer, is a balanced, nourished, and harmonious you.

Yes, I’m sure it’s easier said than done, but on the other hand, if enough people are awake, and not enamored with, and distracted by meaninglessness, it wouldn’t be as hard as you think.

The only truth in the FDA’s use of the term “cure” is in a legal context, as in copyright protection, or intellectual property. Even though it would need a registered trademark, such as Microsoft uses with “Windows^®“. They have no basis otherwise. And given the contractual nature of corporate dealings, it is starting to make more sense that the FDA is acting more so as an entity for the regulation and protection of the intellectual property of the companies that have paid its protection fees for the agency’s “approval.”

SPONSORED LINK: Love Proclamations, not just for the holidays and special occasions, but for everyday! Give one to another. Give one to yourself!

From Rat Poison to Anticoagulant Champion

Yes, there has to be some apparent plausibility to an applicant’s claim, but by what notion does the agency and medical industry as a whole, think that Warfarin, which began its commercial life in 1948 as a rodenticide (rat poison), would be deemed and remain an acceptable, preferred, even celebrated antithrombin (anticoagulant or blood thinner)?

The answer may lie in the fact that the introduction of animal-based compounds into humans goes back several hundred years. One notable milestone was with the development of the smallpox vaccine after Edward Jenner (1748-1823) convinced the British Crown that cowpox material was a suitable and equally effective substitute than human smallpox (which was administered via a process called via variolation), which was much more difficult to culture.

Experiments by contemporary scientists didn’t support Jenner’s hypothesis, but he received a large reward (£10,000 in 1802 was a lot of money) for his idea, and high regard in the annals of medical history, because by the end of the 19th Century, vaccinations were widespread in all industrialized nations, and required as a condition of entry in public schools in the U.S.

The move to animal-based material to produce a smallpox vaccine wasn’t done for altruistic reasons. It was simply a more effective way to run a business. Cowpox was far easier to culture and stockpile than human smallpox. In Great Britain, every vaccination was administered at a price of 18 pence. If an individual couldn’t pay, he didn’t get the drug. No exceptions. No mercy.

The vaccination mark was a convenient way to verify, at a glance, who had paid, and who had not.

Smallpox eventually went away as London cleaned up its squalid sanitary conditions that several million people lived under. However, the “victory” over smallpox was attributed to the vaccine. Given how it made the rich vaccine makers even richer, at the expense of the rest of the population, the race was on to find more isolated conditions that could be remedied in the same manner.

It is a testament to the integrity of the human genome — until the early 1950’s — that it has been so stable, otherwise this might have become commonplace by now.

The unexamined, unquestioned, and unchallenged acceptance of vaccines opens many rabbit holes that we’re already going down, still generally unaware that we’re falling.

From the Centers for Disease Control’s own web site, some common substances found in vaccines today include:

• Aluminum gels or salts of aluminum which are added as adjuvants to help the vaccine stimulate a better response. Adjuvants help promote an earlier, more potent response, and more persistent immune response to the vaccine.
• Antibiotics which are added to some vaccines to prevent the growth of germs (bacteria) during production and storage of the vaccine. No vaccine produced in the United States contains penicillin.
• Egg protein is found in influenza and yellow fever vaccines, which are prepared using chicken eggs. Ordinarily, persons who are able to eat eggs or egg products safely can receive these vaccines.
• Formaldehyde is used to inactivate bacterial products for toxoid vaccines, (these are vaccines that use an inactive bacterial toxin to produce immunity.) It is also used to kill unwanted viruses and bacteria that might contaminate the vaccine during production. Most formaldehyde is removed from the vaccine before it is packaged.
• Monosodium glutamate (MSG) and 2-phenoxy-ethanol which are used as stabilizers in a few vaccines to help the vaccine remain unchanged when the vaccine is exposed to heat, light, acidity, or humidity.
• Thimerosal is a mercury-containing preservative that is added to vials of vaccine that contain more than one dose to prevent contamination and growth of potentially harmful bacteria.

Bio-electric Consequences of Drugs are Ignored

Because the producers of these concoctions are so focused on eradicating some fictionalized and trumped-up “enemy” referred to as a “disease,” they have zero concern for the disruptive effects that vaccines have on the natural bio-electricity of the being. For its part, the trusting public is unaware of the evolutionary price that it is currently paying to remain party to this medical charade.

Vaccine inoculations, done repeatedly and with increased frequency, compromise neurological and synaptic function, which in turn, adversely affect cognitive and organ functions. Since these compounds are synthetic and biocidal unto themselves (e.g., the preservatives), the body isolates and stores what it can’t naturally metabolize or flush out. Yet, when the pathologies finally and sometimes suddenly hit, such as it does autism, stroke, heart attacks, etc., we never think of the unnatural chemicals we agreed, by contract, to take in, even though we the public have been largely uninformed, and the professional, misinformed. We therefore allow further treatment with more synthetic, disruptive, or mutagenic agents.

It is becoming clearly evident that if this trend of making artificial and synthetic alterations to human biophysics, biochemistry, and bio-electricity continues, the “normal” human being may one day indeed look like this:

The salient point that I want to make here is that you should understand what is being done, even if you don’t know why. I don’t claim to know why these agencies, the FDA included, are doing what they’re doing. However, I have figured out that it’s not to the benefit of the human spirit. As such it is not beneficial to human evolution.

If FDA representatives were to read my blog, they might think that I am “against” them. I am not. Imagine if we lived in a world where there was no options, no diversity of opinion but that which was “approved” by the governing authority. That would be a Totalitarian society. We may be moving in a quasi-Fascist direction here, but we’re not Totalitarian yet.

The people who run and work for the FDA, Dept of Justice, and all such agencies, should know that their policies and methods affect them too, their progeny and heirs just as they can affect anyone else’s. If you don’t care about Daniel Smith’s life and freedoms, do you care about your own? How about the life and freedoms of your children? If you make the world that they inherit have fewer natural, unadulterated options, you compromise the very core of their humanity, affecting life span, resistance to disease, health restoration, and natural reproductive ability.

If we can’t reproduce naturally and enjoy robust health, what do we do if your scientists run out of test tubes?

You are not exempt from these issues. The Dept. of Justice representatives are not exempt. The paid actors in the court system are not exempt from the consequences of their policies, rulings, and choices either.

So I am simply calling a corporation-protecting spade a corporation-protecting spade. Don’t worry, the New York Times, Wall Street Journal, Washington Post, Time Magazine or Nature, won’t be publishing my work anytime soon.

The truth is that the FDA has no business suggesting that it is doing anything associated with real cures, which is inferred in its literature, when its history and current practices are clearly resulting in the restriction or denial of access to real cures, and with the help of other alphabet agencies, the escalation of “diseases.”

As such, the cures that they must be referring to, are those that are protected by intellectual property laws (copyright). In other words, “©ure$”

There’s a certain irony about the FDA’s claims of MMS being an industrial bleach when if you did a chemical analysis of normally treated tap water, you’d likely find similar bleaching agents to what they claim MMS is even though it is not that. This is in spite of the fact that sodium chlorite is one compound that some municipalities use for water disinfection because it produces no carcinogenic disinfection byproducts.

Guilt by Sovereignation?

It’s very possible the news stories that you will hear when the trial comes up may include inferences that Daniel is claiming to be a “sovereign” citizen, which the prosecution and the court appear to think would be prejudicial against the defendant and his case. Daniel has never made such a claim although he has had plenty of opportunity to do so if that was the basis of his actions.

A woman in Chicago was recently sentenced to 7 years in Federal prison for filing several multibillion-dollar liens on court officials. (See story.)

The Anti-Defamation League and the Southern Poverty Law Center both characterize the sovereign citizen movement as anti-government, extremist, some with white supremacist tendencies. Said movement is described as growing, even in its characterization as being bizarre. I can see how it might be deemed that way when each day, citizens see evidence of what qualifies as tyranny, as defined by the Constitution that we grew up respecting and honoring, and no one appearing to notice, or care.

Law enforcement agencies have become more enamored with force, than common law. Authorities place more value in people “doing what they’re told,” than weighing the true merits of the action before acting.

I find it interesting that Wikipedia doesn’t have an entry for tyranny. It redirects to tyrant. There is a tyranny “disambiguation” link, but it only treats the subject ambiguously.

Fascinating, eh?

Let me suggest purchasing some of my Love Proclamations and sending to the DoJ and FDA. They need love too. 🙂

Please follow and like us: